The REPowerEU: An EU Climate Ambitions and Its Implications On Russian-European Energy Geopolitics Stability

Main Article Content

Abd Azis
Tiara Marshanda Andrian
Dinda Nurhaliza Akhrianti

Abstract

As the third largest carbon-emitting country in the world, the European Union has more responsibility to address the problem of preventing climate change. However, the climate management policies implemented by the European Union need to be more effective to achieve the long-term targets in the Paris Agreement. Responding to this, the European Union is planning a new policy, REPowerEU. REPowerEU is a follow-up effort from the European Union towards a clean energy transition and a form of Europe's anger towards Russia's geopolitical energy behaviour. In addition, the REPowerEU Plan is a tool the European Union uses to break away from energy dependence on Russia so that it can be more independent in determining foreign policy. This study aims to assess the impact of the implementation of the European Union's energy policy on Russian-European political stability. This study uses qualitative methods by collecting data through literature studies. This research is analyzed using the neoclassical realism paradigm based on energy geopolitics.  It found that there are positive and negative impact in applying REPowerEU to decrease dependency of Russia’s energy supply to Europe.

Article Details

How to Cite
Azis, A., Marshanda Andrian, T. ., & Nurhaliza Akhrianti, D. . (2023). The REPowerEU: An EU Climate Ambitions and Its Implications On Russian-European Energy Geopolitics Stability. Journal of International Studies on Energy Affairs, 3(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.51413/jisea.Vol3.Iss2.2022.152-165
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Abd Azis, Universitas Pertamina

 

 

Tiara Marshanda Andrian, Universitas Pertamina

 

 

Dinda Nurhaliza Akhrianti, Universitas Pertamina

 

 

References

Amul, G. G., & Shrestha, M. (2015). Cities and Climate Diplomacy. Climate Diplomacy.

Angelika, Y. (2019). Motif Kerjasama Energi Turki dan Rusia dalam Turkish Stream Pipeline Project. Jurnal Demokrasi & Otonomi Daerah, 17 (1), 25-30.

Baran, Z. (2007). EU Energy Security: Time to End Russian Leverage. The Washington Quarterly, 30 (4), 131-144.

Bramastya, R. B., & Puspitarini, R. C. (2022). Geopolitik Ukraina terhadap Rusia dan Uni Eropa. Sospoli, 2 (2), 94-102.

European Commission. (2021). Renewables overtake fossil fuels as the EU's main power source. Retrieved from European Union: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/en/ip_21_5554/IP_21_5554_EN.pdf.

Friedrich, o., Ge, M., & Pickens, A. (2020). This Interactive Chart Shows Changes in the World's Top 10 Emitters. Retrieved from wri-indonesia.org: https://wri-indonesia.org/en/blog/interactive-chart-shows-changes-worlds-top-10-emitters

Hanifah, U. R. (2017). Embargo Ekonomi sebagai Strategi Konfrontasi Uni Eropa terhadap Rusia pada Masa Konflik Ukraina 2013-2015. Jurnal Sosial Politik, 3 (2), 169–195.

Hidayatullah, M. N. (2021). European Union’s Climate Diplomacy: Wasted Money or One Step Forward for the Future? Retrieved from Kontekstual: https://kontekstual.com/european-unions-climate-diplomacy-wasted-money-or-one-step-forward-for-the-future/

Högselius, Per, 2009. "The internationalization of the European electricity industry: The case of Vattenfall," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(3-4), pages 258-266, September.

IMF. (2022). How A Russias Natural Gas Cutoff Could Weigh on European Economies. Retrieved from The International Monetary Fund: https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2022/07/19/blog-how-a-russias-natural-gas-cutoff-could-weigh-on-european-economies

Kusumawardhana, I. (2021). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Luar Negeri. Yogyakarta: CV Pustaka Ilmu Group.

Parry, E. J. (2007). The Greatest Threat To Global Security: Climate Change Is Not Merely An Environmental Problem. Retrieved from United Nations: https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/greatest-threat-global-security-climate-change-not-merely-environmental-problem

Rose, G. (1998). Review: Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, 51 (1), 144-172.

Singarimbun, L. A. (2022). Dependensi Energi Uni Eropa-Rusia di Tengah Pusaran Konflik Rusia-Ukraina. Retrieved from Pusat Studi Perdagangan Dunia UGM: https://cwts.ugm.ac.id/2022/03/20/dependensi-energi-uni-eropa-rusia-di-tengah-pusaran-konflik-rusia-ukraina/

Sulastri, A. (2013). Politik Energi Rusia dan Dampaknya terhadap Eropa terkait Sengketa Gas Rusia-Ukraina 2006-2009. Jurnal Analisis Hubungan Internasional, 2 (3), 33-57.

Syuryansyah, S., & Berthanila, R. (2022). Upaya Penyelesaian Konflik Rusia-Ukraina. Jurnal Power in International Relation, 7 (1), 97-105.

UNEP. (2022). Emissions Gap Report 2022. Retrieved from UN Environment Programme: https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2022

Yiwananda, Y., & Nugrahani, H. S. (2021). Realisasi Kebijakan Energi Terbarukan Uni Eropa (UE) oleh Denmark dalam Upaya Menghadapi Ancaman Pemanasan Global. Intermestic: Journal of International Studies, 6 (1), 121-146.