The Rising Dragon and The Defending Eagle: Understanding the Geopolitical Rivalry between U.S. - China in South China Sea
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper aims to understand the geopolitical rivalry between the long-standing great power U.S. and the world’s emerging economic power China, particularly their rivalry within contested South China Sea. This article conducted qualitative methods to produce in depth analysis towards the phenomenon. One question is at stake which is what both powers want in South China Sea. The answer raises an additional inquiry; what kind of significances that South China Sea promises for either U.S. or China? This article argues that U.S. and China both strive for control over the territory. To answer the latter question, this paper is using a geopolitical approach, emphasizing on the lines of communication and centers of resources that South China Sea offers. This paper also argues that China’s geopolitical objective is intended to strengthen their regional hegemony, ultimately global pre-eminence in the long-term. Meanwhile, U.S. seeks to re-assert their power in the region and to rebalance their rising power.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Dunn, C., & Barden, J. (2018, August). EIA. Retrieved December 13, 2020, from More than 30% of global maritime crude oil trade moves through the South China Sea: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=36952
EIA. (2013, April 3). The South China Sea is an important world energy trade route. Retrieved December 13, 2020, from EIA: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=10671
Grygiel, J. (2006). Great Powers and Geopolitical Change. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kreisher, O. (2018). Southeast Asian Nations Wary of Choosing Sides in Rift Between U.S., China. . Retrieved December 13, 2020, from Seapower Magazine: https://seapowermagazine.org/southeast-asian-nations-wary-of-choosing-sides-in-rift-between-u-s-china
Meidan, M. (2020). China’s oil demand in the. The Oxford Institutes for Energy Studies.
Metelitsta, A., & Kupfer, J. (2014). Oil and Gas Resources and Transit Issues in The South China Sea. Asia Society Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://asiasociety.org/sites/default/files/S/SouthChinaSea_OilGas_brief.pdf
OECD. (2018). China's Belt and Road Initiative in the Global Trade, Investment, and Financial Landscape.
Pence, M. (2018). Mike Pence: The United States seeks collaboration, not control, in the Indo-Pacific. Retrieved from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mike-pence-the-united-states-seeks-collaboration-not-control-in-the-indo-pac
Qi, H. (2019). Joint Development in the South China sea: China's incentives and policy chices. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 220-239. doi:10.1080/224761028.2019.1685427
Quinn, C. (2020, July). The U.S. Declared China's South China Sea Claims 'Unlawful'. Now What? Retrieved December 13, 2020, from Foreign Policy: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/07/14/the-u-s-declared-chinas-south-china-sea-claims-unlawful-now-what/
Shulong, C. (2014). Perspective in the South China Sea: Diplomatic, Legal, and Security Dimensions of the DIspute. CSIS.
The Military Balance. (2020). The International Institute for Strategic Studies
The U.S. Department of Defense. (2018). Advancing a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Region [Fact Sheet]. Retrieved from The U.S. Department of Defense: https://www.state.gov/advancing-a-free-and-open-indo-pacific-region/
The U.S. Department of Defense. (2019). Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnership and Promoting a Networked Region. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF
Ujvari, B. (2019). The Belt and Road Initiative – the ASEAN Perspective. Security Policy Brief of Egmont Institute No. 107.